|
The Ohio Department
of Transportation
Office
of Systems Planning and Program Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The concept of Functional
Classification is not as mysterious or complex as it first
appears. Most of us have an intuitive understanding that
streets, roads, and highways serve different uses or
"functions," and we act on this understanding when
choosing a road or highway to meet our trip needs. We associate
certain characteristics with certain types of facilities, and we
classify or group them according to these characteristics. Even
the names we give them often reveal a great deal about the
general character of the facilities and the type of service we
expect from them. They may suggest the locale of the facility,
whether rural or urban; the volume, type, and speed of traffic
typically using it; or even some of the physical features it is
most likely to have such as multi-lanes or median divider. We
may even associate a particular purpose of travel or type of
trip with the name.
We are more likely to take
an Interstate rather than a “country road” when we need to
drive a long distance in the shortest possible time. Directness
of travel, high speeds, and minimal delay are some of the
characteristics we associate with an Interstate highway. If we
take the “country road” instead, we are choosing a very
different trip and driving experience in terms of travel speeds,
time, traffic volumes, and overall travel ease. For much the
same reasons, we look for a “freeway” rather than a “local
street” to take us across town or across county, hoping to
avoid congestion and the stop and go traffic caused by signals
and cross streets. But most of us prefer to live on
“neighborhood streets” rather than “main highways”
though we know that we must use the one to get to the other.
“Boulevard,” “thoroughfare,” or “parkway” bring to
mind other features and characteristics which we associate with
these types of facilities. Sometimes our terminology is
confusing if not contradictory. As someone pointed out, we still
call some roads “freeways” even when there is a toll charge
for using them. Many of our “expressways” resemble parking
lots at rush hour. And we drive on “parkways” but park on
“driveways.”
Whatever we call them, our
effort to classify streets and highways based on their general
characteristics reveals an important point about the process. It
is not an exact or precise science. It depends to a certain
extent on experience and judgment, and no single measurement or
criteria is sufficient to describe or define a class of roads.
Nevertheless, the general concepts of each classification hold
true no matter how much the details vary, and we have a
relatively clear picture of what is meant when we talk about a
“freeway,” an “Interstate,” or even a “main
highway.” The Functional Classification system is similar in
this respect. The criteria used to describe each class of
highway must apply to a wide range of conditions in which the
highway operates such as geography, population density, traffic
volumes, highway spacing, and distance and speed of travel.
While we may not be able to put exact figures to these measures
and no one of them is sufficient to classify a highway, taken
together they provide an effective set of guidelines for
classifying and ranking different facilities.
Functional Classification
is the grouping of roads, streets, and highways in a hierarchy
based on the type of highway service they provide. Streets and
highways do not operate independently. They are part of an
interconnected network, and each one performs a service in
moving traffic throughout the system. Generally, streets and
highways perform two types of service. They provide either
traffic mobility or land access and can be ranked in terms of
the proportion of service they perform as shown in this diagram.
|

|
At the top are
Arterials. They include those classes of highways
emphasizing a high level of mobility for the through
movement of traffic. Land access is subordinate to this
primary function. Generally, travel speeds and distances
are greater on these facilities compared to the other
classes. The highest classes of arterials, Interstates
and freeways, are limited access to allow the free flow
of traffic.
|
|
Between these
extremes are the Collectors whose name describes their
function. They collect traffic from the lower facilities
and distribute it to the higher. Collectors provide both
mobility and land access. Generally, trip lengths,
speeds, and volumes are moderate.
|
|
At the bottom are
Local streets and roads. Their primary function is to
provide land access. Travel speeds, distances, and
volumes are generally low, and through traffic is
usually discouraged.
|
ODOT'S ROADWAY
INVENTORY SYSTEM OF IDENTIFICATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL
CLASSIFICATION OF A ROADWAY:
|
1
|
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
- INTERSTATE (RURAL)
|
|
2
|
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
- OTHER (RURAL)
|
|
6
|
MINOR ARTERIAL
(RURAL)
|
|
7
|
MAJOR COLLECTOR
(RURAL)
|
|
8
|
MINOR COLLECTOR
(RURAL)
|
|
9
|
LOCAL (RURAL)
|
|
11
|
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
- INTERSTATE (URBAN)
|
|
12
|
PRIN. ART.- OTHER
FRWY/EXPRESSWY (URBAN)
|
|
14
|
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
- OTHER (URBAN)
|
|
16
|
MINOR ARTERIAL
(URBAN)
|
|
17
|
COLLECTOR (URBAN)
|
|
19
|
LOCAL (URBAN)
|
In
1974, the Federal Highway Administration published the manual,
Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and
Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and remains the
definitive guide to the functional classification process. The
manual defines the different functional systems, discusses the
general concepts and characteristics used to identify each, and
explains the procedures to follow in designating a system. The
following discussion is based on this manual.
Functional Classification
is divided into rural and urban systems. The urban functional
classification system covers all streets, roads, and highways
located within urban boundaries designated by the U.S. Census
Bureau. The Bureau defines two types of urban areas based on
population. Small urban areas are urban places with a population
or 5,000 or more and not located within any urbanized area. An
urbanized area is an area with a population of 50,000 or more.
As might be expected, the rural functional classification system
covers all other streets, roads, and highways that are not
located within the boundaries of small urban and urbanized
areas.
While urban and rural
areas differ, for example, in terms of the density of land use
and intensity of traffic and travel, the same general functional
concepts apply to both systems. Streets and roads are ranked
according to their purpose or function in meeting the demands
for mobility and land access. The principal difference between
the two systems is the length of trips both in time and
distance.
Rural Functional
Classification System
The rural functional
classification system consists of all highways located outside
urban and urbanized area boundaries. There are four classes of
highways in the rural system: principal arterials, minor
arterials, major and minor collectors, and locals. The
characteristics of each class are as follows:
Class
|
Characteristics
|
|
1.
Rural Principal
Arterial
|
a. Serve corridor
movements having trip length and travel density
characteristics indicative of substantial statewide or
interstate travel;
|
|
|
b. Connect all or
nearly all urban areas with 50,000 and over population and
the majority of urban areas with 25,000 and over
population;
|
|
|
c. Provide an
integrated network of continuous routes.
|
* The Rural Interstate
highway system constitutes a subsystem of Rural Principal
Arterials and is composed of those routes specifically
designated as Interstate highways. All other non-Interstate
principal arterials are included in the subsystem Rural Other
Principal Arterials.
|
2.
Rural Minor
Arterial
|
a. Connect cities
and larger towns (and other major destinations such as
resorts capable of attracting travel over long
distances) and form an integrated network providing
interstate and intercounty service;
|
|
|
b. Spaced at
intervals so that all developed areas are within a
reasonable distance of an arterial;
|
|
|
c. Provide service
to corridors with trip lengths and travel density greater
than those served by rural collectors and local roads and
with relatively high travel speeds and minimum
interference to through movement.
|
|
3.
Rural
Collectors
|
a. Serve primarily
intracounty rather than statewide travel;
|
|
|
b. Serve more
moderate travel speeds and distances than those on
arterial routes.
|
|
|
|
| 4. Rural Locals |
a. Provide access to adjacent land; |
|
b. Serve travel over relatively short distances. |
|
Urban Functional Classification System
The urban functional classification system consists of all
roads, streets, and highways located inside the urban/urbanized area boundary. There are four classes of
highway in the urban system: urban principal arterials, urban
minor arterials, collector streets, and local streets. Because of
the greater concentration of population, more intense land use,
and higher traffic volumes in the urban area compared to rural,
some characteristics of urban classes differ slightly from their
rural counterparts, for example in the density and spacing of the
urban network and in the volume and length of trips.
|
Class
|
Characteristics
|
| 1. Urban Principal Arterial |
a. Serve major activity centers, highest volume
corridors, and longest trip demands; |
|
b. Carry high proportion of total urban travel on
minimum of mileage; |
|
c. Interconnect and provide continuity for major
rural corridors to accommodate trips entering and leaving urban
area and movements through the urban area; |
|
d. Serve demand for intra-area travel as between the
central business district and outlying residential areas. |
| *The Urban Principal Arterial system is further
divided into the following subclasses: (a) Urban Interstate
consisting of principal arterials designated as part of the
Interstate system; (b) Urban Other Freeways/Expressways consisting
of non-Interstate principal arterials with controlled access; and
(c) Urban Other Principal Arterials without controlled access. |
| 2. Urban Minor Arterials |
a. Interconnect with and augment the principal
arterials; |
|
b. Serve trips of moderate length at a somewhat lower level of
travel mobility than principal arterials; |
|
c. Distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas than those
served by principal arterials; |
|
d. Provide more land access than principal arterials without
penetrating identifiable neighborhoods; |
|
e. Provide urban connections for rural collectors. |
| 3. Urban Collectors |
a. Serve both land access and traffic circulation
in residential, and commercial/industrial areas; |
|
b. Penetrate residential neighborhoods; |
|
c. Distribute and channel trips between local streets and
arterials |
| 4. Urban Locals |
a. Provide direct access to adjacent
land; |
|
b. Provide access to higher systems; |
|
c. Carry no through traffic movement. |
Extent of the Systems
As the preceding shows, functional criteria and characteristics
are qualitative rather than quantitative. Geography, population
density, land use, the size of road network, and travel patterns
vary too greatly from state to state, as well as within a state, to
allow an exact measurement of criteria such as trip lengths, traffic
volumes, spacing of routes, or size of population centers. However,
the results of classification studies by the various states show
that the relative size of their systems is fairly similar and
consistent when expressed as a percentage of their total mileage.
The FHWA manual presents a range of percentages to be used in
establishing the relative size of the rural and urban systems.
Range as % of total rural mileage
|
Class
|
VMT
(vehicle miles of travel)
|
Miles
|
| Principal Arterial |
30-55
|
2-4 |
Principal Arterial +
Minor Arterial |
45-75
|
6-12* |
| Collectors |
20-35
|
20-25 |
| Local |
5-20
|
65-75 |
* Most states fall in the 7-10% range
Guidelines for extent of Urban Functional System
Range as % of total urban mileage
|
Class
|
VMT
(vehicle miles of travel)
|
Miles
|
| Principal Arterial |
40-65
|
5-10 |
Principal Arterial
+ Minor Arterial |
65-80
|
15-25 |
| Collectors |
5-10
|
5-10 |
| Local |
10-30
|
65-80 |
Extraordinary circumstances such as
topography or density of the highway network may make it impossible
for a few areas to stay within the ranges for some classes and still
adequately serve travel demands. However, the majority of areas,
both rural and urban, should be able to develop an efficient
functional system without exceeding the percentage guidelines, and
the total statewide system is expected to conform to the federal
percentages in each functional classification.
|
A Funding Tool
Historically, one of the most important
uses of functional classification has been to identify those
streets and roads that are eligible for federal funds. Since the
early 1920s, functional classification has been used to assign
facilities to a Federal-aid Highway System. The original
Federal-aid Primary, Federal-aid Secondary, Federal-aid Urban, and
National Interstate systems all relied on functional
classification to select eligible routes. In 1968 and again in
1973, Federal-aid Highway Acts specifically mandated nationwide
studies in cooperation with States and local governments to bring
greater consistency to highway classifications and to classify all
public streets and highways according to their function. The
results of these studies were then used to revise the respective
Federal-aid Highway systems. The functional classification systems
and the Federal-aid systems have also been realigned following
each decennial Census since 1970.
In 1991, the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) eliminated the Primary,
Secondary, and Urban Federal-aid systems and created the National
Highway System (NHS). However, ISTEA continued the requirement
that a street, road, or highway had to be classified higher than a
Local in urban areas and higher than a Local and Minor Collector
in rural areas before federal funds could be spent on it. The
selection of routes eligible for NHS funding was also based on
functional criteria. In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act
changed eligibility requirements slightly. The Act allows up to
15% of amounts reserved for rural areas to be spent on rural minor
collectors. In urban areas, an eligible facility must still be
classified above an Urban Local.
A Management Tool
While eligibility for federal funding continues to be an
important use for functional classification, it has also become an
effective management tool in other areas of transportation
planning. As one indicator of a route's relative importance in the
movement of goods and people, functional classification is used as
a basis for statewide system needs, and fiscal studies. Along with
other criteria, it is used to help set priorities for expenditures
and to make capital investment decisions. For example, in
ACCESS
OHIO, the state's long-range transportation plan, ODOT used
functional classification concepts to identify a system of Macro
Corridors critical to the state's economic and social well-being.
The Transportation Review Advisory Council
(TRAC), created in 1998
to assist ODOT in selecting major new construction projects, uses
functional classification as one measure of transportation
efficiency in ranking and scoring proposed projects. ODOT also
uses functional classification in determining maintenance
allocations, data collection needs, and design criteria for
various roadway features such as lane and shoulder widths,
horizontal and vertical clearances, and design speeds.
Ohio System Revisions and Updates
Ohio's Functional Classification system undergoes a
comprehensive review after each decennial U.S. Census. ODOT and
local jurisdictions cooperate in designating new boundaries for
all urban and urbanized areas based on the new boundaries
established by the U.S. Census Bureau. These adjustments result in
the transfer of some mileage and routes from the rural and urban
systems and, therefore, require a change in the route's functional
classification. The decennial update is also a time to conduct a
complete review of all route classifications to ensure they still
accurately reflect the function and service provided by the
facility.
Special mandates from the Federal Highway Administration may
also require particular functional classification studies from
time to time. The most recent example is the effort in 1991 under
ISTEA to select arterials eligible for federal funds as part of
the National Highway System.
Finally, ODOT revises the functional classification systems as
needed to respond to changes in the highway network. Changes in
traffic volumes and travel patterns affect the way particular
roads function and the level and type of service they provide.
Construction of new roads and realignments and relocations of
existing roads require updating of classifications. ODOT also
receives routine requests from local authorities asking for
changes because of new development and growth occurring in their
areas. ODOT reviews every request to ensure the route complies
with federal functional classification requirements and percentage
levels.
Functional Classification Inventory
The Functional Classification inventory files available for
viewing give a complete listing of all public streets, roads, and
highways in Ohio classified above Local. The lists are organized
by ODOT District. Within the district, the list is arranged
alphabetically by county by urban area by route. If no urban area
is listed, the route is rural. Each entry also includes a physical
description of the route's termini and its current Functional
Classification. Questions or comments concerning the lists should
be sent to Jerry Workman, Office of Systems Planning and Program
Management,
at 614-387-5417 or
Jerry.Workman@dot.state.oh.us.
|
|
|
|
|