The Ohio Department of Transportation
 Office of Systems Planning and Program Management
 

Background Information

   

 

 

Concept

The concept of Functional Classification is not as mysterious or complex as it first appears. Most of us have an intuitive understanding that streets, roads, and highways serve different uses or "functions," and we act on this understanding when choosing a road or highway to meet our trip needs. We associate certain characteristics with certain types of facilities, and we classify or group them according to these characteristics. Even the names we give them often reveal a great deal about the general character of the facilities and the type of service we expect from them. They may suggest the locale of the facility, whether rural or urban; the volume, type, and speed of traffic typically using it; or even some of the physical features it is most likely to have such as multi-lanes or median divider. We may even associate a particular purpose of travel or type of trip with the name.

We are more likely to take an Interstate rather than a “country road” when we need to drive a long distance in the shortest possible time. Directness of travel, high speeds, and minimal delay are some of the characteristics we associate with an Interstate highway. If we take the “country road” instead, we are choosing a very different trip and driving experience in terms of travel speeds, time, traffic volumes, and overall travel ease. For much the same reasons, we look for a “freeway” rather than a “local street” to take us across town or across county, hoping to avoid congestion and the stop and go traffic caused by signals and cross streets. But most of us prefer to live on “neighborhood streets” rather than “main highways” though we know that we must use the one to get to the other. “Boulevard,” “thoroughfare,” or “parkway” bring to mind other features and characteristics which we associate with these types of facilities. Sometimes our terminology is confusing if not contradictory. As someone pointed out, we still call some roads “freeways” even when there is a toll charge for using them. Many of our “expressways” resemble parking lots at rush hour. And we drive on “parkways” but park on “driveways.”

Whatever we call them, our effort to classify streets and highways based on their general characteristics reveals an important point about the process. It is not an exact or precise science. It depends to a certain extent on experience and judgment, and no single measurement or criteria is sufficient to describe or define a class of roads. Nevertheless, the general concepts of each classification hold true no matter how much the details vary, and we have a relatively clear picture of what is meant when we talk about a “freeway,” an “Interstate,” or even a “main highway.” The Functional Classification system is similar in this respect. The criteria used to describe each class of highway must apply to a wide range of conditions in which the highway operates such as geography, population density, traffic volumes, highway spacing, and distance and speed of travel. While we may not be able to put exact figures to these measures and no one of them is sufficient to classify a highway, taken together they provide an effective set of guidelines for classifying and ranking different facilities.


Definition

Functional Classification is the grouping of roads, streets, and highways in a hierarchy based on the type of highway service they provide. Streets and highways do not operate independently. They are part of an interconnected network, and each one performs a service in moving traffic throughout the system. Generally, streets and highways perform two types of service. They provide either traffic mobility or land access and can be ranked in terms of the proportion of service they perform as shown in this diagram.

Mobility and Access (19347 bytes)

At the top are Arterials. They include those classes of highways emphasizing a high level of mobility for the through movement of traffic. Land access is subordinate to this primary function. Generally, travel speeds and distances are greater on these facilities compared to the other classes. The highest classes of arterials, Interstates and freeways, are limited access to allow the free flow of traffic.

Between these extremes are the Collectors whose name describes their function. They collect traffic from the lower facilities and distribute it to the higher. Collectors provide both mobility and land access. Generally, trip lengths, speeds, and volumes are moderate.

At the bottom are Local streets and roads. Their primary function is to provide land access. Travel speeds, distances, and volumes are generally low, and through traffic is usually discouraged.

 

ODOT'S ROADWAY INVENTORY SYSTEM OF IDENTIFICATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF A ROADWAY:

1

PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE (RURAL)

2

PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER (RURAL)

6

MINOR ARTERIAL (RURAL)

7

MAJOR COLLECTOR (RURAL)

8

MINOR COLLECTOR (RURAL)

9

LOCAL (RURAL)

11

PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE (URBAN)

12

PRIN. ART.- OTHER FRWY/EXPRESSWY (URBAN)

14

PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER (URBAN)

16

MINOR ARTERIAL (URBAN)

17

COLLECTOR (URBAN)

19

LOCAL (URBAN)

 


 

Functional Systems: Criteria and Characteristics

In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration published the manual, Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and remains the definitive guide to the functional classification process. The manual defines the different functional systems, discusses the general concepts and characteristics used to identify each, and explains the procedures to follow in designating a system. The following discussion is based on this manual.

Functional Classification is divided into rural and urban systems. The urban functional classification system covers all streets, roads, and highways located within urban boundaries designated by the U.S. Census Bureau. The Bureau defines two types of urban areas based on population. Small urban areas are urban places with a population or 5,000 or more and not located within any urbanized area. An urbanized area is an area with a population of 50,000 or more. As might be expected, the rural functional classification system covers all other streets, roads, and highways that are not located within the boundaries of small urban and urbanized areas.

While urban and rural areas differ, for example, in terms of the density of land use and intensity of traffic and travel, the same general functional concepts apply to both systems. Streets and roads are ranked according to their purpose or function in meeting the demands for mobility and land access. The principal difference between the two systems is the length of trips both in time and distance.

Rural Functional Classification System

The rural functional classification system consists of all highways located outside urban and urbanized area boundaries. There are four classes of highways in the rural system: principal arterials, minor arterials, major and minor collectors, and locals. The characteristics of each class are as follows:

Class

Characteristics

1. Rural Principal Arterial

a. Serve corridor movements having trip length and travel density characteristics indicative of substantial statewide or interstate travel;

b. Connect all or nearly all urban areas with 50,000 and over population and the majority of urban areas with 25,000 and over population;

c. Provide an integrated network of continuous routes.

* The Rural Interstate highway system constitutes a subsystem of Rural Principal Arterials and is composed of those routes specifically designated as Interstate highways. All other non-Interstate principal arterials are included in the subsystem Rural Other Principal Arterials.


2. Rural Minor Arterial

a. Connect cities and larger towns (and other major destinations such as resorts capable of attracting travel over long distances) and form an integrated network providing interstate and intercounty service;

b. Spaced at intervals so that all developed areas are within a reasonable distance of an arterial;

c. Provide service to corridors with trip lengths and travel density greater than those served by rural collectors and local roads and with relatively high travel speeds and minimum interference to through movement.


3. Rural Collectors

a. Serve primarily intracounty rather than statewide travel;

b. Serve more moderate travel speeds and distances than those on arterial routes.

    There are two subclasses of Rural Collectors.

    (1). Rural Major Collectors (a) Provide service to any county seat, larger towns, and other county destinations such as consolidated schools, parks, or important mining and agricultural area not served by an arterial;
    (b) Connect these places with nearby larger towns and cities or with arterial routes;
    (c) Serve the most important intracounty travel corridors.
    (2). Rural Minor Collectors (a) Are spaced at intervals to collect traffic from local roads and bring all developed areas within reasonable distance of a collector;
    (b) Provide service to smaller communities not served by a higher class facility;
    (c) Connect locally important traffic generators with rural hinterlands.

4. Rural Locals a. Provide access to adjacent land;
b. Serve travel over relatively short distances.

Urban Functional Classification System

The urban functional classification system consists of all roads, streets, and highways located inside the urban/urbanized area boundary. There are four classes of highway in the urban system: urban principal arterials, urban minor arterials, collector streets, and local streets. Because of the greater concentration of population, more intense land use, and higher traffic volumes in the urban area compared to rural, some characteristics of urban classes differ slightly from their rural counterparts, for example in the density and spacing of the urban network and in the volume and length of trips.

 

Class

Characteristics

1. Urban Principal Arterial a. Serve major activity centers, highest volume corridors, and longest trip demands;
b. Carry high proportion of total urban travel on minimum of mileage;
c. Interconnect and provide continuity for major rural corridors to accommodate trips entering and leaving urban area and movements through the urban area;
d. Serve demand for intra-area travel as between the central business district and outlying residential areas.
*The Urban Principal Arterial system is further divided into the following subclasses: (a) Urban Interstate consisting of principal arterials designated as part of the Interstate system; (b) Urban Other Freeways/Expressways consisting of non-Interstate principal arterials with controlled access; and (c) Urban Other Principal Arterials without controlled access.


2. Urban Minor Arterials a. Interconnect with and augment the principal arterials;
b. Serve trips of moderate length at a somewhat lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials;
c. Distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas than those served by principal arterials;
d. Provide more land access than principal arterials without penetrating identifiable neighborhoods;
e. Provide urban connections for rural collectors.

3. Urban Collectors a. Serve both land access and traffic circulation in residential, and commercial/industrial areas;
b. Penetrate residential neighborhoods;
c. Distribute and channel trips between local streets and arterials

4. Urban Locals a. Provide direct access to adjacent land;
b. Provide access to higher systems;
c. Carry no through traffic movement.

Extent of the Systems

As the preceding shows, functional criteria and characteristics are qualitative rather than quantitative. Geography, population density, land use, the size of road network, and travel patterns vary too greatly from state to state, as well as within a state, to allow an exact measurement of criteria such as trip lengths, traffic volumes, spacing of routes, or size of population centers. However, the results of classification studies by the various states show that the relative size of their systems is fairly similar and consistent when expressed as a percentage of their total mileage. The FHWA manual presents a range of percentages to be used in establishing the relative size of the rural and urban systems.

    Guidelines for extent of Rural Functional System

     

Range as % of total rural mileage

Class
VMT
(vehicle miles of travel)
Miles
Principal Arterial

30-55

2-4
Principal Arterial +
Minor Arterial

45-75

6-12*
Collectors

20-35

20-25
Local

5-20

65-75

* Most states fall in the 7-10% range

Guidelines for extent of Urban Functional System

 

Range as % of total urban mileage

Class
VMT
(vehicle miles of travel)
Miles
Principal Arterial

40-65

5-10
Principal Arterial
+ Minor Arterial

65-80

15-25
Collectors

5-10

5-10
Local

10-30

65-80

Extraordinary circumstances such as topography or density of the highway network may make it impossible for a few areas to stay within the ranges for some classes and still adequately serve travel demands. However, the majority of areas, both rural and urban, should be able to develop an efficient functional system without exceeding the percentage guidelines, and the total statewide system is expected to conform to the federal percentages in each functional classification.


A Funding Tool

Historically, one of the most important uses of functional classification has been to identify those streets and roads that are eligible for federal funds. Since the early 1920s, functional classification has been used to assign facilities to a Federal-aid Highway System. The original Federal-aid Primary, Federal-aid Secondary, Federal-aid Urban, and National Interstate systems all relied on functional classification to select eligible routes. In 1968 and again in 1973, Federal-aid Highway Acts specifically mandated nationwide studies in cooperation with States and local governments to bring greater consistency to highway classifications and to classify all public streets and highways according to their function. The results of these studies were then used to revise the respective Federal-aid Highway systems. The functional classification systems and the Federal-aid systems have also been realigned following each decennial Census since 1970.

In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) eliminated the Primary, Secondary, and Urban Federal-aid systems and created the National Highway System (NHS). However, ISTEA continued the requirement that a street, road, or highway had to be classified higher than a Local in urban areas and higher than a Local and Minor Collector in rural areas before federal funds could be spent on it. The selection of routes eligible for NHS funding was also based on functional criteria. In 1998, the Transportation Equity Act changed eligibility requirements slightly. The Act allows up to 15% of amounts reserved for rural areas to be spent on rural minor collectors. In urban areas, an eligible facility must still be classified above an Urban Local.


A Management Tool

While eligibility for federal funding continues to be an important use for functional classification, it has also become an effective management tool in other areas of transportation planning. As one indicator of a route's relative importance in the movement of goods and people, functional classification is used as a basis for statewide system needs, and fiscal studies. Along with other criteria, it is used to help set priorities for expenditures and to make capital investment decisions. For example, in ACCESS OHIO, the state's long-range transportation plan, ODOT used functional classification concepts to identify a system of Macro Corridors critical to the state's economic and social well-being. The Transportation Review Advisory Council (TRAC), created in 1998 to assist ODOT in selecting major new construction projects, uses functional classification as one measure of transportation efficiency in ranking and scoring proposed projects. ODOT also uses functional classification in determining maintenance allocations, data collection needs, and design criteria for various roadway features such as lane and shoulder widths, horizontal and vertical clearances, and design speeds.


Ohio System Revisions and Updates

Ohio's Functional Classification system undergoes a comprehensive review after each decennial U.S. Census. ODOT and local jurisdictions cooperate in designating new boundaries for all urban and urbanized areas based on the new boundaries established by the U.S. Census Bureau. These adjustments result in the transfer of some mileage and routes from the rural and urban systems and, therefore, require a change in the route's functional classification. The decennial update is also a time to conduct a complete review of all route classifications to ensure they still accurately reflect the function and service provided by the facility.

Special mandates from the Federal Highway Administration may also require particular functional classification studies from time to time. The most recent example is the effort in 1991 under ISTEA to select arterials eligible for federal funds as part of the National Highway System.

Finally, ODOT revises the functional classification systems as needed to respond to changes in the highway network. Changes in traffic volumes and travel patterns affect the way particular roads function and the level and type of service they provide. Construction of new roads and realignments and relocations of existing roads require updating of classifications. ODOT also receives routine requests from local authorities asking for changes because of new development and growth occurring in their areas. ODOT reviews every request to ensure the route complies with federal functional classification requirements and percentage levels.


Functional Classification Inventory

The Functional Classification inventory files available for viewing give a complete listing of all public streets, roads, and highways in Ohio classified above Local. The lists are organized by ODOT District. Within the district, the list is arranged alphabetically by county by urban area by route. If no urban area is listed, the route is rural. Each entry also includes a physical description of the route's termini and its current Functional Classification. Questions or comments concerning the lists should be sent to Jerry Workman, Office of Systems Planning and Program Management, at 614-387-5417 or Jerry.Workman@dot.state.oh.us.