Rating Question No. 1

10 Management personnel are always available and execute the directions of the engineer.

 08 Management personnel are routinely available and comply with the directions of the engineer.

 05 Management personnel are available part of the time and sometimes offer resistance to the directions of the engineer prior to compliance.

 01 Management personnel are routinely not available and disagree or disregard the directions of the engineer most of the time.

 Rating Question No. 2

10 Contractor is always competent in scheduling work and is very punctual in starting project and meeting all contract dates.

 08 Contractor effectively schedules work operations carefully and makes a good effort to meet all contract dates.

 05 Contractor's work schedule is usually available and is generally followed to ensure contract dates are attained.

 01 Contractor's day to day operations do not follow work schedule and contract dates are not met.

 Rating Question No. 3

10 The contractor always has management personnel available who are thoroughly experienced and knowledgeable in the type of work being performed and have a thorough understanding of the specifications, plans and special contract provisions with no instruction needed from the project engineer.

 08 The contractor has management personnel available who are experienced in the type of work being performed and are familiar with the specifications, plans and contract special provisions with minimal instruction from the project engineer.

 05 The contractor has management personnel available who are familiar with some of the types of work being performed and has some knowledge of the specifications, plans and contract special provisions and requires instruction from the project engineer.

 01 The contractor has management personnel available who have limited knowledge of the type of work being performed and require constant instructions from the project engineer in interpreting the specifications, plans and contract special provisions.

 Rating Question No. 4

10 Contractor always staffs the project with an adequate number of competent workers to perform the work and continuously monitors their performance.

 08 Contractor routinely staffs the project with enough competent workers to perform the work and monitors their performance.

 05 Contractor staffs the project with inadequate number of competent workers to perform the work and occasionally monitors their performance.

 01 Contractor does not staff the project with enough competent workers to perform the work and does not monitor their performance.

 Rating Question No. 5

10 Contractor always furnished timely submittals of all required paperwork, documentation, material reports, time extension notices, claim information, etc. as required with minimal request.

 08 Contractor routinely furnished timely submittals of all required paperwork, documentation, material reports, time extension notices, claim information, etc. as required with minimal request.

 05 Contractor has to be asked numerous times to furnish required paperwork, documentation, material reports, time extension notices, claim information, etc.

 01 Contractor does not furnish required paperwork, documentation, material reports, time extension notices, claim information, etc. in a timely manner and must be asked in writing.

 Rating Question No. 6

10 The contractor always informed the project engineer of his daily schedule of operations.

 08 The contractor routinely informed the project engineer of his daily work schedule.

 05 The contractor informed the project engineer of his daily work schedule after repeated notifications.

 01 The contractor informed the project engineer of his daily work schedule only after written notification.

 Rating Question No. 7

10 The contractor always followed chain of authority by initiating all requests and communications through the project engineer.

 08 The contractor routinely followed chain of authority by initiating requests and communications through the project engineer.

 05 The contractor occasionally followed the chain of authority by initiating requests and communications through the project engineer.

 01 The contractor did not follow the chain of authority by initiating requests and communications through the PE/PS.

 Rating Question No. 8

10 The contractor always complied with the direction from the project engineer.

 08 The contractor routinely complied with the direction from the project engineer.

 05 The contractor complied with the direction after repeated notification from the project engineer.

 01 The contractor complied only upon written direction from the project engineer.

 Rating Question No. 9

10 The contractor always conducted his work so as not to interfere with or hinder the work of other contractors on adjacent projects.

 08 The contractor routinely conducted his work so as not to interfere with or hinder the work of other contractors on adjacent projects only after notification from the project engineer.

 05 The contractor conducted his work so as not to interfere with or hinder the work of other contractors only after repeated notification from the project engineer.

 01 The contractor conducted his work so as not to interfere or hinder the work of other contractors only upon written notice from the project engineer.

Rating Question No. 10

10 This contractor has no documented violations of the ODOT contract specifications relating to Labor Standards/Wage-Rate Compliance and prompt payment.

 08 The contractor had documented violations of the ODOT contract specifications relating to Labor Standards/Wage-Rate Compliance and prompt payment. However, these violations were immediately corrected upon notification by the Department.

 05 The contractor had documented violations of the ODOT contract specifications relating to Labor Standards/Wage-Rate Compliance and prompt payment. These violations were corrected only after repeated notification by the Department.

 01 This contractor has numerous documented violations of the ODOT contract specifications relating to Labor Standards/Wage-Rate Compliance and prompt payment which were not corrected.

Rating Question No. 11

10 Contractor always complied with all EEO laws and regulations, and provisions for on the job training. appropriate D.B.E. regulations.

08 Contractor complied with all EEO laws and regulations, and provisions for on the job training appropriate D.B.E. regulations after notification from by the project engineer Department.

05 Contractor complied with all EEO laws and regulations, and provisions for on the job training appropriate D.B.E. regulations after repeated notification from by the PE/PS Department.

01 Contractor did not comply with all EEO laws and regulations. and provisions for on the job training. appropriate D.B.E. regulations.

Rating Question No. 12

10 Contractor always provided the appropriate numbers and types of equipment to do the work.

 08 Contractor did not always provide the appropriate numbers and types of equipment to do the work. However, this did not substantially effect the progress of the project.

 05 Contractor did not always provide the appropriate numbers and types of equipment to do the work which effected the progress of the project.

 01 Contractor did not provide the appropriate numbers and types of equipment to do the work.

Rating Question No. 13

10 Equipment breakdowns that may have occurred did not impede the progress of the project.

 08 Equipment breakdowns that occurred caused minimal delay to the project.

 05 Equipment breakdowns that occurred impeded the progress of the project.

 01 Equipment breakdowns severely impeded the progress of the project.

Rating Question No. 14

10 Contractor always maintained the work site in a safe and clean condition.

 08 Contractor often maintained the work site in a safe and clean condition and immediately corrected deficiencies upon notification from the project engineer.

 05 Contractor maintained the work site in a safe and clean condition after repeated notification from the project engineer.

 01 Contractor did not maintain the work site in a safe and clean condition.

Rating Question No. 15

10 Contractor always assigned an individual to continually monitor and maintain all traffic control requirements. Any job site conditions which effected the traveling public were corrected immediately (even after hours) with no direction from the project engineer.

 08 Contractor assigned an individual to continually monitor and maintain all traffic control requirements. Most deficiencies were immediately corrected without notification by the project engineer.

 05 It was necessary to notify the contractor of traffic control deficiencies. The deficiencies were corrected upon notification from the project engineer.

 01 Contractor required continual notification of job site deficiencies in traffic control requirements. Deficiencies were corrected only after written notification by the project engineer.

Rating Question No. 16

10 Contractor always complied with the contract requirements.

 08 Contractor routinely complied with the contract requirements. Any non-compliances were immediately corrected upon notification from the project engineer.

 05 Non-compliances were corrected only upon repeated notification from the project engineer.

 01 Contractor complied with contract requirements only upon written order of suspension of work from the project engineer.

Rating Question No. 17

10 The contractor did not have to remedy or remove any defective work.

 08 It was necessary for the contractor to make minor repairs and corrections to the work.

 05 It was necessary for the contractor to make numerous repairs to the work.

 01 It was necessary for the contractor to remove or correct a substantial amount of work due to poor workmanship.

Rating Question No. 18

10 The contractor always provided advance notifications to all potentially effected utilities prior to commencing work and did whatever was necessary to cooperate with the utility and protect their existing facility.

 08 The contractor routinely provided proper notification and cooperated with each effected utility company. Documented problems existed but were immediately corrected by the contractor.

 05 The contractor provided proper notification to all effected utilities after direction from the project engineer. Documented problems existed where the contractor did not cooperate fully with the utility company in protecting the existing facility.

 01 The contractor did not provide the proper notification to the effected utilities and/or after notification, did not make an effort to cooperate with the utility company nor protect the existing facility.

Rating Question No. 19

10 Contractor always scheduled and conducted operations to avoid urgencies.

 08 Contractor attempted to schedule and conduct operations to avoid urgencies. Any problems created were immediately corrected.

 05 Contractor's scheduling and conducting of operations created urgencies which were corrected only upon direction of the project engineer.

 01 Contractor did not schedule and conduct operations to avoid urgencies.

 Rating Question No. 20

10 The contractor performed final clean-up on or before the completion date and received no punch list.

 08 The contractor performed final clean-up on his own and once given the final punch list, completed the work on or before the specified date.

 05 The contractor completed the final clean-up and the punch list only after repeated notification from the project engineer.

 01 The contractor did not complete the final clean-up and the final punch list in a timely manner.

Rating Question No. 21

10 The contractor always coordinated work operations with its subcontractors.

 08 The contractor routinely coordinated all work operations with its subcontractors.(sub-subcontractors). When coordination did not occur, this did not substantially effect the progress of the project.

 05 The contractor coordinated work operations with its subcontractors (sub-subcontractors) only upon notification from the project engineer.

 01 The contractor did not coordinate work operations with its subcontractors.

Rating Question No. 22

10 Contractor always exercised authority over subcontractors and provided notice of subcontractor schedule at all times.

 08 Contractor routinely exercised authority over subcontractors and provided notice of subcontractor schedule most of the time.

 05 Contractor exercised authority over subcontractors and provided notice of subcontractor schedule only upon notification from the project engineer.

 01 Contractor did not exercise any authority over subcontractors and/or did not provide notice of subcontractors' work schedule.

Rating Question No. 23

10 Contractor always monitored subcontractors' activities to ensure approved materials were supplied and incorporated into the project at all times.

 08 Contractor routinely monitored subcontractors' activities to ensure approved materials were supplied and incorporated into the project. Any problems were corrected immediately upon notification by the project engineer.

 05 Contractor monitored subcontractors' activities to ensure approved materials were supplied and incorporated into the project only upon repeated notification from the project engineer.

 01 Contractor did not monitor subcontractors' activities to ensure approved materials were supplied and incorporated into the project at all times.

Rating Question No. 24

10 Contractor always ensured subcontractors submitted all paperwork required for approvals, materials, and payrolls in a timely manner.

 08 Contractor routinely ensured subcontractors submitted all paperwork required for approvals, materials, and payrolls in a timely manner with minimal notification from the project.

 05 Contractor ensured subcontractors submitted all paperwork required for approvals, materials, and payrolls in a timely manner with repeated notification from the project.

 01 Contractor did not ensure subcontractors submitted all paperwork required for approvals, materials, and payrolls in a timely manner. Information had to be requested in writing.

(Revised C-95)

 A. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

1) To what degree are management personnel available with full authority to execute the directions of the engineer ?

 2) To what degree are management personnel competent and effective in scheduling the work and organizing construction operations, including being punctual in starting and completing the work on the project and meeting critical intermediate phases in accordance with the approved progress schedule ?

 3) To what degree did management personnel have the knowledge necessary regarding specifications, plans and the special provisions?

 4) How adequately was the project staffed with competent workers who were monitored ?

 5) To what degree did the contractor furnish the required documentation and reports in a timely manner (ie. Certification of materials, delivery tickets, invoices, progress schedule, shop drawings, material sampling, early notice of time extension, potential claims, etc.) ?

 6) Did the contractor inform project personnel in advance of scheduled day to day items of work ?

 7) To what degree was the chain of authority in the department respected by the contractor (positive attitude toward project personnel, etc.) ?

 8) Did the contractor comply with the direction of project personnel without delay ?

 9) To what degree did the contractor cooperate with other contractors performing work on adjacent projects ?

 10) Did the contractor comply with all wage rates and labor regulations, and submit accurate certified payrolls and promptly pay all subcontractors and material suppliers?

 11) Did the contractor comply with all EEO laws and regulations, and on-the-job training special provisions appropriate D.B.E. regulations?

B. EQUIPMENT

12) Did the contractor provide the appropriate number and type of equipment necessary for performance of the work ?

13) Did the contractor provide preventative maintenance and repairs of equipment to ensure against breakdowns which would impede the progress of the project ?

C. WORK PERFORMANCE

14) To what degree was the work site maintained in a safe and clean condition ?

15) To what degree did the contractor maintain adequate signs, lights, barricades, and properly trained flagpersons in accordance with Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, traffic control plan and approved revisions ?

16) To what degree did the contractor meet contract requirements including specifications, supplemental specifications, special provisions, plans, and supplementary documents and erosion control with minimal instruction from the department ?

17) To what degree did the contractor provide attention to the quality of work performed eliminating the need to remedy or remove defective work ?

18) To what degree did the contractor properly notify and coordinate work with utility companies in protection of existing utilities ?

 19) To what degree did the contractor minimize urgencies of construction that required ODOT to compromise the quality of work or abandon good construction practices in order to complete the project. (ODOT forced to allow poor weather paving, incorporate non-specified material, etc.) ?

 20) To what degree were final clean up and punch list items complete ?

D. SUBCONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT (SUB-SUBCONTRACTOR)

 21) To what degree did the contractor coordinate work with subcontractors work ?

 22) To what degree did the contractor exercise authority over subcontractors and provide notice of subcontractor work schedule ?

 23) To what degree did the contractor monitor subcontractor activities to ensure approved materials were supplied and incorporated into the project ?